• God Of Resolution Mac Os X
• Mac Os Is Based On
• Os Resolution Page
• History Of Mac Os

8 – God is a Geek “Resolutiion is tough, but fair. A game that should be enjoyed by anyone who likes to discover a story and piece together lore as opposed to something streamlined and linear like many titles are.”.

• There have been two major changes in DNS resolution in Mac OS X Snow Leopard as compared to Mac OS X Leopard and previous releases, and this tip is intended to explain them. 1) User-specified DNS servers, if any, are now used to the exclusion of all others.
• ⚠ Fairly Demanding: You'll need a recent Mac. System requirements: OS X 10.9.5, 2.2 Ghz Intel Core i3, 4 GB RAM, 10 GB HD space, NVIDIA Geforce 330M, ATI Radeon HD 3870, or Intel HD 3000 with 256 MB of Video Memory. Role-Playing: Medium: No: Wasteland 2: Director’s Cut: Wasteland 2: Director’s Cut.
• Download LINKInteractive company is now back again with the new game which is now finally available for.

God Of Resolution Mac Os X

This is not working for me running Mavericks in a Parallels virtual machine -- the display is stuck on 1024x768 (my native host screen resolution is 1600x900) and I can't find a way to change the guest (Mavericks) screen resolution to anything else. Admittedly this may be a Parallels issue and not a Mavericks issue, but man I wish Apple would stop removing reasonable features such as selecting a different screen resolution. We don't all have 20/20 vision to run our displays at the highest possible resolution.

This sounds more like a Parallels VM Tools problem. OS X is only showing what the hardware suggests to be capable of. If the virtual GPU isn’t 'capable' of a higher resolution you’re stuck. I’d ask in the parallels support forums.

Mac Os Is Based On

If it works at all like it does when you're running Windows in a Parallels VM, and you're running it windowed, you should be able to resize the VM window and the machine inside will change its resolution to match. Might even stick after that if you switch to fullscreen, but not sure.

Another example of Apple not following their own Human Interface Guidelines.
IIRC, the HIG states that if a control (menu Item, button etc.) changes it's behaviour while option is being held, the text of the control has to change when only the option key is being held. This makes 'hidden' options somewhat discoverable for people who know about the 'option-click' concept.
If you open the 'Apple' menu, you can see a nice example of how the control texts change (also note the subtle hints about different behaviour with the disappearing ellipses).

Normally I'm pretty forgiving about a lot of Apple's design decisions, but this one, they really blew it on the HIG, and standard design in general--in addition to (as you point out) it not changing the text at all when you hold down option to indicate that will do anything, the way menus do, has ANY radio button on the MacOS, ever, worked that way before?
I've certainly never seen one.
(Despite having used the MacOS since System 6 and being very used to hidden things, I nearly bought SwitchResX, not realizing that this could be done until I ran across a post in a forum somewhere.)

Os Resolution Page

Thanks for posting this, it was exactly what I needed. There's really no hint at all in the UI that this is possible. I am, admittedly, not a Mac expert, but I can't say I've ever seen a radio button with this behavior before either. In OS X, or any other OS.
Other than this one issue (which is no longer an issue), I'm wishing I had updated from Snow Leopard sooner. Mavericks actually seems faster so far.

History Of Mac Os

Great hint! Even though I'm used to Apple hiding extra menu options behind the 'option' modifier this one is particularly bad as there is no text accompanying this button to suggest that pressing 'option' does anything. I really hate when Apple does this kind of stuff. It's terrible UI design.